Meet the New Librarian

A few weeks ago, Apple introduced its new 4S iPhone.  Baked into the operating system was Siri, a voice interactive artificial intelligence.  More than just a voice interface, Siri is also (at least to the degree that the iPhone’s sensors allow) contextually aware and has search capability.  While she can be used for tasks as simple as setting up calendar reminders, she can also aggregate information.  And unlike other voice interactive AIs, Siri’s creators went to great lengths to give her an appealing persona.  So she’s not just an interface, she’s also interactive. 

In a test question of “Find me the best gas prices” Siri said she couldn’t make a recommendation on which one to choose, but found the nearest five gas stations and their prices for me.  This shows she can’t make qualitative judgment calls yet.  But Siri has been enough of a hit that she’ll be further developed and honed.  It may be that Siri will become the first widely available commercial AI (although a “weak” AI). 

Being paranoid about my livelihood I started to wonder: What does this mean for librarians and information brokers? 

In specialized settings like mine, I think librarians distinguish themselves from the rabble in two ways.

1. The ability to translate the client’s context into search strategies.
2. The ability to use sophisticated information retrieval tools.  While most people have access to information tools, they either use them really poorly or don’t know how to use them at all. 

I’m not going to prophesy that Siri is the end of librarianship.  Right now she’s about as skilled in collecting information as a high school senior.  But I do think that Siri’s ability to contextually aggregate information makes her a potential disruptor for librarians. 

The real question is how much Siri will eventually be leveraged to perform complex searches and aggregation.  If she’s only used for simple tasks (example: Find me movie times.  Find me local Thai restaurants. Etc. etc.) then she won’t be any more disruptive than Google has already been.  (Google, by the way, has to be worried about what this technology will to its search business.)  If that’s the case, then it’s likely that she’ll be just another tool librarians leverage more effectively than the rabble to provide high quality, targeted information. 

But what if/when she gets smarter?  What happens to the library profession when true artificial intelligence is cheaply and commercially available?  What then will be our place?  How will our profession work alongside and/or leverage AIs to do new and different work?  

No answers.  Only questions.  But its important that the field start looking in this direction. 

Librarians as Connectors

A colleague and I recently established a regular roundtable meeting between several different groups all working towards the same goal, but who were not connecting with each other.

This got me thinking…  One aspect of librarianship (embedded or otherwise) that is often taken for granted the librarian as connector. 

In large corporations, it’s not uncommon for multiple groups from different parts of the company to be working towards the same goal or on the same topic without knowing of each other. 

Because we assist a wide variety of people in finding information about a wide variety of topics, we get to view what a lot of different groups are working on.  And because of our familiarity with the groups and the subject matter, librarians are in in a position to see the connections between them and introduce them to one another. 

This can sometimes be better than if they find out about each other’s work through other channels.  For while corporations have a habit of having simultaneous groups unknowingly working topics in tandem, there is also the tendency to get into territorial pissing matches around those topics once the groups discover each other.  It can degenerate into a more civilized version of gang warfare.  But librarians can step in as a neutral third party to help gently introduce each group to one another and point out synergies.  

This helps The Corporation in a couple of ways. 

• It makes connections between groups that might not already exist and therefore leverage a larger force of people and skills toward the common goal. 
• It can help eliminate duplicate work efforts.
• It can assist in leveraging the skills of individual group members that might be absent from their adjacent teams. 

Back to the roundtable example…  The Corporation I work for has several groups looking at emerging technology from very different angles.  It makes sense for each of the groups to exist in their own silos. While chatting with a member of the other group we came to the conclusion that while we do a great job of keeping our respective clients informed about technology, we don’t network with one another very often.  There were probably things each group was seeing the others could benefit from.  Or, there was information that one group was finding which wasn’t relevant to them, but would be highly relevant to one of the other groups if they only knew the other group was interested in it. 

So now we gather every two weeks to discuss items we’re seeing and have a fairly lively email network to share items between one another.  (I suppose knowledge management folks would call this a “community of practice.”)  Additionally, we’ve come to find that individual members have specialized skill sets that others in the group were looking for, but didn’t know where to find.  Even if the roundtable doesn’t last, the members now know about each other and can feel comfortable reaching out to one another for assistance in specific circumstances.

What do you think?  What other ways can librarians act as connectors within large groups? 

Adapting to Change Sucks... But it’s Necessary

http://futureready365.sla.org/10/24/darwinian-librarian/

This post from SLA’s Future Ready 365 blog really resonated with me.  I’m not a fan of change.  I find change a disruptive annoyance. I like my life nice and stable and predictable unless I decide I want to change it.  Contrary to corporate speak, I think most of humanity functions on similar principles. 

Alas, neither the universe nor my corporation embrace my philosophy on change.  And as painful as change is for me, I’ll admit that change is often necessary for us to grow.  If there is anything that losing my library and becoming an mercenary embedded librarian have taught me it’s that adaptability is crucial to remaining relevant and employed (and sane).  The author of this piece gets that.  Its adaptability that allows librarians to use their underlying skills for new purposes, sometimes for purposes which they were never designed. It’s also adaptability that will ensure our profession continues into the future.